“Creation Scientists” vs. Real Scientists
Why, you ask, are Creation scientists not truly scientists? Item one: provided that it doesn’t appear to contradict their holy books, Creation scientists couldn’t care less about how the natural world works. The creationist I recently encountered certainly exhibited that mindset. He of course, was merely a random engineering student.
To see how professional Creation scientists approach the natural world, read Abbie Smith’s tour de force account of scientific inquiry (and creationist inquiry) into the “VPU” gene/protein in HIV.
And, you see, scientists arent like ‘Creationist’ scientists. They dont see a black box, declare a deity made the box, and take the rest of the week off. Scientists see problems and demand answers.
Why not take the week off? What do those Darwinist pigs think they’re going to learn anyway?
In six months, evolutions ‘just so story’ [led to the discovery of a new anti-viral component of the human innate immune system, suggesting] new drug targets for new HIV/AIDS therapies, and a brand new avenue of research for immunologists and virologists all over the world
…
What has Behe been doing the past six months?
I don’t really think an “Item Two” is necessary after that. Creation Science is a joke. A very bad joke.
Leave a Reply